🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to approve a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the local government level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, further states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this global debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that states around the world are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.