🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.